[flyXwire]

Originally Posted by muesingman

An Angels Skyhawk??

Definitely NO !!!

I would like to have an ISRAELI one.

I too would like to get an IAF camo Skyhawk!


http://www.skyhawk.org/5e/g155242/html/155254.htm
http://www.skyhawk.org/5e/g155242/html/155271.htm
http://www.skyhawk.org/5e/g155242/html/155287.htm
http://www.skyhawk.org/5e/g155242/html/155289.htm
http://www.skyhawk.org/6e/html/0-isrtunkn.htm

[JETFAN]

Like "the Man" says "A-4s Forever!!!!"

I think we will see a variety of A-4 versions in a a good mix of unit markings.

The only one we might not see are the Singapore A-4S with the double canopies. I remember seeing and phgotographing them them at NAS Lemoore when they were transitioning into type.

[JETFAN]

Like "the Man" says "A-4s Forever!!!!"

I think we will see a variety of A-4 versions in a a good mix of unit markings.

The only one we might not see are the Singapore A-4S with the double canopies. I remember seeing and photographing them at NAS Lemoore when they were transitioning into type.

[jim]

Have you developed a stutter Jetfan?

[SKUNKY]

He knows you don't hear very well, jim, so he repeated himself for you.

[SKUNKY]

He knows you don't hear very well,jim, so he repeated himself for you.

[Raven]

My 2 cents.

I agree with those that prefer that combat aircraft take priority. There are enough very interesting USN, Israeli, etc... planes that I would rather see first than a Blue Angles. Not that I don't like the idea of an Angels Skyhawk - I just like my planes representative of operational/combat planes.

[JETFAN]

Jim,
No stutter; I just wanted to get the message across. A-4S FOR EVER!!!

and correct the typos