|
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | # 11 Quick Link (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks
The point is they are detailed model tanks. Maybe you'd be happier collecting coins. They are never even partially plastic, always 100% die-struck metal. Very heavy, lots to choose from, good collector value...But not tanks. As a tank collector, if HM's product stayed the same but increased price by 25% I'd lose interest. I'd have more money to spend on Dragon Armor, which is a shame because I have too many Tigers as it is. | ||||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | |||||||||||||||
| Sponsored links | |
| | # 12 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks PickMattock, your reply to my comment seems kind of mean spirited. What's up with that? I have no interest in coins! | |||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | ||||||||||||||
| | # 13 Quick Link (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks
Oh - I thought this was "a forum for the diecast community" (look at the top of the page). I think that if we call ourselves "diecast model collectors" then our models should be made out of mostly metal. You must be a "plastic model collector". | ||||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | |||||||||||||||
| | # 14 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks Yikes…I don’t want to be a cyber-bully, I just want to discuss little tanks. From now on I’ll remember to use the smiley faces liberally. When you stated that you collected die-cast models because they were metal and asked what the point of collecting plastic models was I supplied what I felt the answer was: They look like tanks. That’s the obvious answer for ME. I collect diecast armor instead of coins because, while both are metal, only one looks like a tank. Plastic models also look like tanks, so I collect them too. Given how much some hobbyists care about weight and feel of the models it seems that they are more of metal enthusiasts than armor enthusiasts, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that. We all enjoy this hobby in our own ways…So…Who cares what I think? (There's probably plenty of diecast car enthusiasts who don't get either of us for liking those ugly tanks.) For me, it’s all about the scale accuracy and detail and finish but has nothing to do with scale weight. So, YES, I am a plastic model collector! I am also a diecast model collecter. I’d collect them in wood or carved in alabaster if they were detailed enough. I’m just a scale model collector…Period. The material is not important to me as long the model looks good. (I certainly don’t let the header on my favorite discussion forum dictate the material of the models I buy.) So if Hobby Master starts making models with less metal that would be fine by me because, in my book, “diecast” is the least important part of “diecast armor”. It’s all about the look of the armor for me. I care more about how they look than how they feel because I certainly spend more time looking at them than feeling them. | |||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | ||||||||||||||
| | # 15 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks Quality of detail is what I'm looking for. Sure, I'd prefer more metal, but if I don't get it, I don't mind. Hobby Master, just keep putting out good stuff. | |||||||||||||
| Anything for a weird life. | ||||||||||||||
| | # 16 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks What it's made of means little. Some of my very best models are over 1/2 plastic. Some of my very worst are 99.9% diecast. And everything inbetween. Honestly---once you put a layer of paint over it, it's impossible to tell by looking---you see the paint, not the material. (And personally, I find plastic to be able to do finer detail, and have better fit between parts) | |||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | ||||||||||||||
| | # 17 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks
Last edited by lanslide : 10-26-2007 at 02:26 AM.
Ok - I suppose I over reacted - but - if the reasons you stated are valid and metal is both more expensive and has its limitations to detail - why would any manufacturer use anything but plastic? If we only like metal for its weight and not for the medium itself, why not just provide enough lead inside to create the weight if nobody cares about the art (including its inherent limitations) of diecast? I hear you guys and maybe these questions are really for me too! I need to re-evaluate my parameters for collecting diecast since you bring up some interesting points. I have always just accepted the fact that diecast has its limitations compared to plastic and have been willing to accept them. I guess I just assumed we were collecting diecast partly because they are made out of diecast metal and I thought THAT was the obvious point. I stand corrected. This would be a good question for "The Pub". P.S. By the way - I have a separate unbuilt plastic model collection! Also, I have been known to pick up those 21st Century Toys and Easy Models pre-built plastic models but I consider those as separate from my diecast collection as well. LOL | |||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | ||||||||||||||
| | # 18 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks Hawk - Will HM put "plastic display model" on the box rather than "die-cast display model" to warn us of the lack of metal content? I certainly hope so (If the chassis is the only thing that is metal it shouldn't be considered a die-cast model). | |||||||||||||
Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar. | ||||||||||||||
| | # 19 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks You need 6-8 For the M-48 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M48_Patton Operators
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| | # 20 Quick Link (permalink) | |||||||||||||
| Re: A change to Hobby Master 1/72 tanks | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.themodelhangar.com/forum/hobby-master-25/39384-change-hobby-master-1-72-tanks.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| The Model Hangar Diecast Forum | This thread | Refback | 03-29-2008 05:38 AM | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HM main site change | majorfatal | Hobby Master | 6 | 07-06-2008 05:08 PM |
| IXO distributor change | dragon53 | IXO Models Junior | 20 | 05-30-2008 05:53 PM |
| Flying Mule Cyber Hobby Tanks | parsig9 | Good Deals | 15 | 05-17-2008 01:12 PM |
| Tamiya 1:48 master work or military miniature tanks | wmosner | The Pub | 4 | 08-13-2007 07:17 AM |
| More 1/72 diecast tanks from Hobby Master | Legio LXXII | Hobby Master | 29 | 06-28-2007 06:50 PM |