The Model Hangar Diecast Forum

Go Back   The Model Hangar Diecast Forum > Manufacturers > Aircraft Models > The Franklin Mint
Graf Bf 109 review  Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.
Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar.
Select Forum
  MARK ALL FORUMS READ
Not a member yet?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-10-2008, 02:35 AM   # 11 Quick Link (permalink)
 Ara1's Avatar
Ara1
Forum Contributor
Meritorious Service Medal

Ara1 is offline Offline
Photos: 279
Referrals:
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Massachusetts
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Hey guys,

I've reworked the right side ammo bulge. It took an hour and was fairly challenging.





You can see it's a bit smoother and in less profile. I haven't touched up paint yet, this is just knife and glue work. How does it look so far?

The left side is waiting for another day.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 01-10-2008, 01:30 PM   # 12 Quick Link (permalink)
 wmosner's Avatar
wmosner
Member

wmosner is offline Offline
Photos: 77
Referrals:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Maryland
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Did you take the bulge off and rework it or just putty it while on the plane? Job so far looks great.
 

Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.

Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 01:47 PM   # 13 Quick Link (permalink)
 Ara1's Avatar
Ara1
Forum Contributor
Meritorious Service Medal

Ara1 is offline Offline
Photos: 279
Referrals:
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Massachusetts
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Did you take the bulge off and rework it or just putty it while on the plane? Job so far looks great.

Thanks wmosner. I removed the plastic bulge, with was sturdily affixed to the fuselage via two locating pins. Then I used a #12 Xacto knife and cleaned what remained on the fuselage and inside the ammo cover. When I dry fitted the part, it was clear that the piece needed to be flattened (with force from my thumb) and reshaped for a tight fit to the fuselage. Using the knife and sandpaper, I carefully cut and sanded the piece a little at a time, dry fitting every few motions so I could see the gaps and where I had to focus my efforts.

I had to cut and sand a significant portion of the rear (pilot's side) of the piece as well as thinning all edges.

The next step (which I haven't yet done) will be to use some Testor's liquid clear window and flow it into the slight remaining gap. When that's dry, I can touch up the paint, but I won't need much. Then it's onto the other side!

It's a fairly difficult rework because the angle is a complex curve and there's a danger of removing too much material.

I will complete this side of the fuselage before attempting any work on the other.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 02:39 PM   # 14 Quick Link (permalink)
Member

Captain Eddie is offline Offline
Photos: 0
Referrals:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Ohio
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Looking good, Ara.....what's a crying shame is it NEEDS the work you're doing!
 

"...a nation at war puts aside all internal conflicts until the moment of victory or defeat..."
Gunther Rall.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 03:15 PM   # 15 Quick Link (permalink)
 wmosner's Avatar
wmosner
Member

wmosner is offline Offline
Photos: 77
Referrals:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Maryland
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Well, I have one on order and will see if it needs the same amount of attention. This has always been one of my favorite schemes for the 109 and Graf was one of Germany's top aces. Would love to see 21st Century, Carousel or Eagle do this one and Hartmann's tulip 109 in 1:48.
 

Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.

Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 03:49 PM   # 16 Quick Link (permalink)
 Ara1's Avatar
Ara1
Forum Contributor
Meritorious Service Medal

Ara1 is offline Offline
Photos: 279
Referrals:
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Massachusetts
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Looking good, Ara.....what's a crying shame is it NEEDS the work you're doing!

Yeah, mine was probably built on the proverbial Friday...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 05:59 PM   # 17 Quick Link (permalink)
Forum Contributor
Meritorious Service Medal

Epapazian is online now Online
Photos: 161
Referrals:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
New York, New York
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

I gave up on Franklin Mint-Armour a number of years ago due to their generally poor quality, lack of detail---especially on the bottoms of their models---and some bad color mistakes. Looking at the pictures you posted of Graf's BF-109, it appears that my concerns remain justified. In addition to the problems already cited, the colors don't look right. The standard upper surface scheme for virtually all Luftwaffe day fighters of this period was a two-tone application of RLM 74 and RLM 75. The former was a somewhat dark grey-green while the latter was a lighter "gray-violet"---the point being to display some disruptive contrasts. As for the sides and under surfaces, these were invariably done in RLM 76---a lighter gray-blue, with darker mottling of the sides via the upper surface colors. Instead of that, the FM BF-109 looks like it was painted with overly dark muddy grays, which show little differentiation. And what is that color on the under surfaces.....neutral gray? It certainly doesn't resemble RLM 76.

To be fair, other manufacturers also have color issues and I have had to repaint many planes from Matchbox, Atlas, Altaya, IXO, Corgi, Model Power and, even Dragon because of this. But FM/Armour has been in the diecast business a lot longer than most other companies. It's a wonder that they still haven't addressed this problem effectively. That said, I have no argument with anyone who likes and buys this model. The whole point of this or any hobby should be the satisfaction of the individual collector and we must recognize that few manufacturers are going to provide us with perfect products-----especially when they have so little control over the actual production and detailing process. I would like some of them to try a lot harder, however.
 

Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.

Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 06:58 PM   # 18 Quick Link (permalink)
Member

Cruver Collecter is offline Offline
Photos: 204
Referrals:
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Longview, Texas
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Ara, nice fix on the bulge! Really does make a change to how the model looks.
 

Check the Ebay Listings forum for the latest diecast model listings on eBay.

Click here to make a donation to support The Model Hangar.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 07:53 PM   # 19 Quick Link (permalink)
 Ara1's Avatar
Ara1
Forum Contributor
Meritorious Service Medal

Ara1 is offline Offline
Photos: 279
Referrals:
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Massachusetts
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

Ara, nice fix on the bulge! Really does make a change to how the model looks.

Thanks CC!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 07:56 PM   # 20 Quick Link (permalink)
 Ara1's Avatar
Ara1
Forum Contributor
Meritorious Service Medal

Ara1 is offline Offline
Photos: 279
Referrals:
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Massachusetts
 

Re: Graf Bf 109 review

I gave up on Franklin Mint-Armour a number of years ago due to their generally poor quality, lack of detail---especially on the bottoms of their models---and some bad color mistakes. Looking at the pictures you posted of Graf's BF-109, it appears that my concerns remain justified. In addition to the problems already cited, the colors don't look right. The standard upper surface scheme for virtually all Luftwaffe day fighters of this period was a two-tone application of RLM 74 and RLM 75. The former was a somewhat dark grey-green while the latter was a lighter "gray-violet"---the point being to display some disruptive contrasts. As for the sides and under surfaces, these were invariably done in RLM 76---a lighter gray-blue, with darker mottling of the sides via the upper surface colors. Instead of that, the FM BF-109 looks like it was painted with overly dark muddy grays, which show little differentiation. And what is that color on the under surfaces.....neutral gray? It certainly doesn't resemble RLM 76.
To be fair, other manufacturers also have color issues and I have had to repaint many planes from Matchbox, Atlas, Altaya, IXO, Corgi, Model Power and, even Dragon because of this. But FM/Armour has been in the diecast business a lot longer than most other companies. It's a wonder that they still haven't addressed this problem effectively. That said, I have no argument with anyone who likes and buys this model. The whole point of this or any hobby should be the satisfaction of the individual collector and we must recognize that few manufacturers are going to provide us with perfect products-----especially when they have so little control over the actual production and detailing process. I would like some of them to try a lot harder, however.

I hear you. I didn't give up on Franklin Mint because there are several I'm very, very happy with. But there are many (Fw 190A, F4U, Spitfire, Zero) I will wait for others to offer.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HM P-400 Review Black 6 Hobby Master 28 06-12-2008 01:46 PM
Review: ME 262 HotTrap429 Forces of Valor 6 02-22-2008 12:41 AM
P-51 Review 1:32 skydriver Forces of Valor 3 11-15-2007 05:59 AM
B-26 Review STARMAN 352ND Forces of Valor 43 10-29-2007 10:53 PM
B-25 Review HotTrap429 Forces of Valor 9 10-01-2007 05:34 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Powered by NuWiki v1.3 RC1 Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC Ad Management by RedTyger Hosted by Netfirms Enterprise Three
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this forum are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the The Model Hangar or it's Affiliates.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71