02-28-2008, 02:38 AM |
# 41 Quick Link (permalink)
|
| Forum Contributor | | Offline
| | Photos: | Referrals: Join Date: Sep 2006 |
Location:
Ft. Benning, GA | | | | Re: HM new releases 1.72 | Looks like all of the original concerns I voiced about the M10 have been addressed. When preview pics first went up on the site I grumbled about the name “Wolverine” being used but it’s nowhere to found on the M10 page anymore. I inquired about the “duck bill” counterweight on liveries they selected, but it’s been changed to the earlier type. Most importantly, I wanted to see grouser stowage racks on the sides of the hull, as they were present on most M10s in the ETO, so I’m THRILLED to see them added to the M10! That's outstanding! My only concern is the track…It needs help. It looks like it falls completely between the drive sprockets, which looks mighty strange. (Throws the look of the whole model off.) They need to be wider (or the drive sprocket needs to be narrower) so that the track end connectors rest in the recesses of the teeth on the sprockets. As is pictured, the vehicle would be immobile! I’m hoping against hope that it’s only a problem peculiar to the proto model, because it really needs to be fixed... Other than that, I’m really happy. Looks like we get a nice turret interior. | I agree, the tracks are either too narrow or the drive sprocket is too large. I mentioned it to Hawk, maybe its too late for the first M-10. Hopefully the Achilles will be corrected. I'm holding out for the Duckbilled turret. But the Achilles is worth a look as the Guards did come to the aid of the 82nd ABN in Nijmegan. |
|
| |